Full HD in 22-inches: The Dell S2209W
I’ve read a bunch of articles on dual-monitors and their benefit towards productivity. I even tried a pair of dual monitors on my own, which wasn’t a bad experience — but I had to return the monitor to its original owners, so it was a pain moving it back and forth after use. I really wanted an external monitor — I was expecting to use it primarily as just a replacement, and not so much an addition to my laptop screen (except at times when I needed to do real work).
So I went with the Dell S2209W. Mainly because I trusted Dell (and my cousin Jonathan from APH Networks really boosts them), but also because I found it for $189.99 during Dell’s 12 Days of Deals a month ago (happy new year, by the way).
I wasn’t expecting much though. I just wanted an ordinary LCD — in fact, if I could find one for an appropriate price, I would’ve gladly picked up a 17″ monitor — saves my Ikea desk some space. But enough stalling: how exactly do I find the Dell S2209W, and was the dive worth it?
I tried taking a more “structured” approach to this review: please, tell me what you think! Inspired by Anandtech’s review on the BenQ E2200HD (a monitor very similar to the S2209W).
Design/Build Quality
Refreshing lack of gloss: the “matte” display. In contrast to the glossy frame of the Dell S2209W (a cool addition, matches my Das Keyboard very well), the display doesn’t have a layer of gloss over it like my Dell Inspiron 6400 does. So far, I appreciate it: it’s affected less by the Incandescent bulb in my study, and now I can actually open the blinds when I compute — that’s right, it fights the glare!
The glossy frame itself can be a topic of debate: although it’s great from a design standpoint, it attracts dust and shows it off. Much like the Das Keyboard. I’ll admit that during normal computing, I can’t notice it — but when I take those macro pictures, I’m a bit ashamed at how dusty it’s getting. As for maintenance to counter the dust, I guess a quick Swiffer every so-often couldn’t hurt.
Kinda cool base: The base that the display stands on is sizeable enough to offer good balance. And it’s got a little embedded lower level — perfect for holding loose change (I’ll keep it clean though, I assure you). Hm, I wonder if it’d have been possible to add a second level and put some USB ports in there though.
No clips to tame those cables and wires! I did manage to stick the majority of cables out through the square tunnel that the Dell S2209W has on the stand, but clips right behind the bottom of the display itself to keep the cables from sight: out of sight, out of mind. Personally, I find it just a bit annoying — but I know quite a few enthusiasts who are big on cabling.
No built-in swivel! Yipes. Although the vertical resolution is acceptable (1080px, great in comparison to 800px on my Dell Inspiron 6400), I really would’ve loved a swivel for reading those long passages (something like this review).
The button placement is typical for today’s monitors: all located on the side, hidden from the eyes and easy to reach. Much appreciated are those little icons — but I just prefer experimenting. The power button is pretty cool though — I didn’t know how to turn the display off at first, but it turns out you actually push the Power light, which will slide down into the frame of the Dell S2209W. It’s really, really cool. It changes to white when the display is active, orange when inactive, and it turns off when the display shuts down. It’s amazing how simple a feature it is, yet how much a contribution it makes to the beauty of the display.
No built-in speakers: meh, didn’t really matter much to me. If you can afford this monitor at regular pricing, you can probably afford a pair of speakers. Har har. Plus, I tend not to believe in the sound quality of monitors (iMac included).
No USB ports: because I’m using a laptop, I always appreciate extra USB ports. The Dell Inspiron 6400 features 4 ports — not exactly a generous amount, but sufficient for now. The Das Keyboard features two ports, and it’s getting enough power not only to power itself but also my Logitech G5 and my iPod on occasion. If the monitor gets power from USB and from the outlet, why not include a few ports? Again, oh well — not a matter of life and death.
No HDMI?! I’m going to be perfectly honest — hold your “boo”s, please — I’m not 100% sure what HDMI is. Here’s what I do know though: it’d probably be best to have HDMI when you want to play PS3 or Blu-Ray on a display. And if I’m going to pay $269.99 for this thing, I want it to be able to display my PS3 and Blu-Ray movies to its best. Doesn’t matter to me, since I have neither a Blu-Ray player nor a PS3, but if I had one I’d be raging.
Official Technical Specifications
| Dell S2209W | |||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
| Environmental and Regulatory | |||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Wow, I’m surprised at how well that chart turned out: you can find the original chart here.
A few observations: it wasn’t just careless observation, it’s official — there’s no HDMI input. I never knew there was a security port though — this would be great for places such as classrooms or even University dormitories (in case you don’t trust your roommates — shame on you, haha only joking).
And a TN panel. Many criticize it for being sucky, I really don’t mind. Of course, I haven’t used anything but TN-panels, but I don’t see what’s so bad about it — image quality is fine during regular computing (and editing). However, for those wanting the best movie-viewing/video-gaming experience, this might be the dealbreaker. First no HDMI, and now this? Keep hope alive.
Unique Screen Resolution and Aspect Ratio
Typically, widescreen computer monitors have an aspect ratio of 16:10 — and thus, 22-inch monitors typically have a screen resolution of 1680×1050 pixels. I never really liked that. I tend to prefer “sharper” images — the most pixels on the least screen area as possible. Meaning that 1680×1050 pixels would’ve been fine, if it was mounted on a 20-inch screen. And if I were to buy anything bigger than a 20-inch monitor, I’d have to go for a 24-inch monitor (they’re not that expensive nowadays) for the 1920×1200 pixels. So when I found the Dell S2209W on Dell’s 12 Days of Deals, I placed an order on it ASAP.
And I didn’t regret it. The pixels are no joke — everything looks much crisper, sharper, and I don’t need to worry about horizontal scrolling anymore. It’s downright impressive at how Dell managed to fit such a high resolution into a 22-inch monitor. 1080 pixels also classifies it as “HD”, but seeing as how I’m connected via VGA, I can’t accurately comment on it. But after eagerly downloading “Amazing Caves in 1080″ from Microsoft’s WMV HD Content Showcase, I had a look. 1080p video was of near-excellent quality; however, I did feel that bright colours were displayed much more precisely than darker ones, which were slightly grainy (almost artifacting).
I also started catching up on some of my favourite anime: downloading 5 episodes from Dattebayo, I watched Bleach in 480p. Wasn’t bad, but it was definitely very different from the 1080p video. Who would’ve thought, right?
What about Image/Video Quality?
Although initially, I had to run it on 1680×1050 pixels because my “graphics card didn’t support it”, according to Dell. But, after clicking through some options and updating my drivers, I actually got it to work — imagine my excitement! From a warped, butt-ugly image (because of the 16:10 resolution on the 16:9 screen ratio), to a crisp, sharp image with a ton of screen real estate.
The Dell S2209W by default was a bit blurry, but after some minor manual tweaking, everything was to my preference (I’m not that picky). As I said earlier, even 1080p plays on full-screen — no black lines, nothing. It’s freaking beautiful. 480p and 720p videos also play full-screen thanks to the Dell S2209W’s aspect ratio, and the differences are viewable (480p is a bit blurrier — not as crisp as 1080p). However, as I did mention earlier, I found the bright colours in videos to be displayed a bit more accurately than darker colours, which were a bit grainy for my taste. But, it could most certainly be due to that VGA connection (still not 100% sure).
I found images to be displayed clearly, sharply, and beautifully. Everyday-use with website graphics is child’s play for the Dell S2209W (as it should be), but the extra pixel count does take a bit of getting used to. Imagine this: from 1280×800 pixels to 1920×1080 pixels. No complaints here though, it’s an excellent adjustment.
Troubleshooting
If you can’t get your Dell S2209W to display at 1920×1080 pixels, update your drivers. After calling Dell Support (the reps did play a part in solving the problem, as they isolated my video card’s maximum resolution being the issue), and Googling around, it’s not an uncommon problem. And updating your drivers is now a near automated process, all thanks to Microsoft. In Windows Vista:
- Right-click your desktop.
- Select “Personalize”.
- Select “Display Settings”.
- Select “Advanced Settings” at the bottom right corner of the window.
- Select the “Adapter” tab, then under “Adapter Type” select “Properties”.
- Select the “Driver” tab in the window that opens, and then click the “Update Driver” button.
- Relax, let Microsoft search for the latest drivers. If there is a newer driver version, it will automatically be downloaded and installed. Hello, improved hardware improvement. Otherwise, sorry — your video card could either be too old or lacking in performance to support such a high resolution. Get a new one, or give away your Dell S2209W (hey, I had to accept this fact too).
Worked for my nVidia Go 7300, which isn’t bad but isn’t exactly “card of the year”. It wouldn’t be a bad idea to Google your graphics card to see its maximum resolution though, in retrospect. Also, updating your drivers will (likely) improve performance — do it whether you’re getting a new monitor or not!
What are ya waitin’ for…
For $269.99, it can go both ways: if you’re looking for a new monitor and do a lot of video-editing (and are not planning to use Blu-Ray or a PS3), then it’s perfect. Heck, I recommend it not only to amateur designers, but to writers and gamers as well (the 16:9 feature on CS:S works well — trust me). It’s the most screen real estate you’ll ever get in a 22-inch monitor — so if you browse the Internet a lot, want to view more than one page on Microsoft Word at once (I can seriously do two at once now, at 100%), take high-res photos, or download some HD content and take advantage of Youtube’s new standard 720p, get it. If you find it for less than $269.99, get it.
If you want a monitor for gaming or watching Blu-Ray movies though, you might want to have a look at BenQ’s E2200HD, as reviewed by AnandTech. Yeah, I tried my best emulating it, but it’s really not the same (especially without “Input” Lag tests, colour accuracy tests, and a comparison to other “real” monitors).














Would’ve been nice to have HDMI!
Nice W610i on the table
I had the same phone.
Ah, it sure would’ve.
Thanks
I like the W610, it’s generally acceptable.
Generally acceptable? I figure it’s one of the best value phones that Sony Ericsson has to offer. It should be respected more.
Anonymous: Wahaha, appreciate the enthusiasm. I used the term “generally acceptable” because it didn’t “wow” me. I guess it does deserve some respect, so I did give it enough credit — but it could use some improvement (including the keypad buttons being enlarged, as well as a sliding lock button on the side as they did with the w600i. and as long as I’m dreaming, why not include wi-fi?).
Use DVI if you want to use 1920×1080 res.
VGA make the image blurry. I have the same lcd and between DVI and VGA there is a HUGE diference.
Nightwalker: Although I haven’t had the opportunity to use DVI, I’ve heard great things about it (HDMI as well, for that matter). Unfortunately, neither my outdated desktop (HP Pavilion with an NVidia GeForce 5200), or my Dell Inspiron 6400 (with an NVidia GeForce 7300 Go!) feature a DVI port. Shame, ain’t it? Still, thanks for the advice and taking time to comment.
i love you boo. GO LAPTOPS!
The lack of HDMI doesn’t matter. HDMI is for digital picture and sound. Since the monitor doesn’t have internal speakers, it’d be a waste. DVI is the same thing as HDMI, just without the audio. Both will give you a 1080p digital picture.
Chris: Haha, thanks — makes me feel a bit better.
You can use a dvi to HDMI converter for ps3 etc, dunno if it’s been mentioned before here.
I’ve got it, awesome monitor for price
Mo: Yep, it’s not a bad idea. Good to see another S2209W user
Glad to see your input, thanks for commenting!
WOW!! That Temperature Range Operating is impressive. Do you have to put it in an oven at 320 degrees before it will start operating? I like the fact that it won’t melt at 1000 degree F even though I would be a crispy critter at that point. Are you sure you copied that right from the tech specs sheet?
Eric: Interesting observation — I’m pretty sure I did copy it right, as of today — I just visited the page that I linked to underneath the chart, and clicked on the ‘Tech Specs’ tab and it was actually the same number. Go figure.
another review stated that it can decode HDMI, you just need a small converter to make HDMI fit into the DVI port.
Ben: Interesting, I think that fits in with the converter we were talking with just now. Thanks for commenting!