Web
ZLoop: Are we Looking at the Future of Social Networking?
Mar 21st
The social networking landscape is growing bleak. With Facebook and Myspace dominating the market, developers hoping to break into this potential gold mine are forced to do it with a new approach. An example of a successful new concept being implemented into the internet would be Ning, a portal where users can create their own social networks. Recently, I came into contact with a new social network called ZLoop, and you’re just going to have to keep reading to see what sets it apart from the rest of those darned social networks. Trust me, it’s definitely interesting.
A week ago, ZLoop evangelist Mr. Brett Meyers contacted me and made me aware of a new up and coming social network, called ZLoop. ZLoop’s main feature that sets it apart from all the other social networks is called a Loop, which is essentially a group or community of people. Membership is purely invitational, which sort of limits the amount of undesirable spam users. Through the Loop, you can transfer files, hold discussions, and potentially meet new people within your Loop. Now that I’m done conveying the main idea of ZLoop to you, I want to move on to issues that you will perhaps have encountered.
Another Facebook?
After talking to a few friends about ZLoop, I was asked what the difference was between ZLoop and Facebook. I actually posed such a question to Meyers through our pre-ZLoop question/answer session. Let’s not beat around the bush – they’re both extremely similar:
- Facebook and ZLoop both use a single GUI in order to keep order and adaptability. Otherwise, a well-intentioned “theme is self-expression” mantra would end up leading to the cluttered, messy, and very disorienting space we call MySpace.
- Facebook and ZLoop are both used to replicate real life relationships – it is a Facebook faux-pas to add friends online that you don’t know in real life, and the same goes for ZLoop. In fact, I think it’s somewhat impossible to add friends that you have no connection with through ZLoop, because you won’t be able to find them.
However, this is where the differences lie:
- What kind of relationships do each focus upon?
- Facebook suggests you join a network during the sign-up process. However, that can be completely negligible and you will probably still be able to find your friends. Thus, I’ve concluded that Facebook focuses on one-on-one relationships. Sure, there’s the network – but you don’t do anything with the people in it. Sure, there are groups – you join what you believe in, but you have no real connection with the other people in the group asides from the shared beliefs – which hasn’t kept members from becoming awfully hostile.
- ZLoop on the other hand, rallies the network together. It is more of a community-based network instead of an individual-based one, as you are required to join a Loop in order to join ZLoop, and thus you already start off in a Loop. Even though there still could be people you don’t know, the discussions are moderated carefully by the administrators as well as members – as members are given the power to report a post. It’s much more like a forum, but it’s got a lot more functionality (ie. again with the file-sharing, event-planning, etc.).
- Privacy
- Facebook allows you to see practically anybody’s profile in your network – as long as they don’t have privacy set up. I can’t tell you how the thought of some complete stranger reading about my hobbies and interests disturbs me – I don’t know why, it just doesn’t seem right.
- ZLoop’s relationships are much different. There is no public wall. In fact, the relationship is very similar to a Loop with just two people in it – that way, nobody can see the conversations the two of you held, or the files you transferred, etcetera.
Hopefully, that clears up the confusion about ZLoop being another Facebook. They’re completely different, asides from having a few common, but minor traits that made Facebook famous.
Copy-Ning?
I’m embarassed to admit it, but I somehow got the impression that ZLoop and Ning were very similar. In terms of nature, they might be quite alike, as they draw communities together – but again, Ning is a networking site to meet new people with, whereas ZLoop replicates real-life relationships and takes it to an online dimension. ‘Nuff said.
Back That Loop Idea
If the Loop idea is still a bit fuzzy to you, I’m hoping this next segment will be able to clear things up a bit. To re-iterate, a Loop is a community where you replicate your online relationships. For example, you work for Company A, which has just created a Loop. Company A sells aPods, and you’re a junior designer. You join the new Company A Loop after hearing it announced at work, and then your buddy Joe tells you that he created a Loop just for Company A’s junior designers. You end up joining that Loop too. Your father tells you a few days after that he, too, has created a Loop – this time, for the family. So now, you’re in three Loops – and will probably end up in a bunch more.
Let’s stick with the Company A Loop:
- Thanks to Company A’s encouragement, everybody from Company A joins the Loop. The CEO sees that it’s time for the annual barbecue – he can:
- Hold a conversation asking what everyone thinks of the proposed location and date.
- Upload a .pdf file, which is an invitation showing the location and date.
- Create an Event showing the same thing.
- After the barbecue, display the photos on the Loop.
That’s just the tip of the iceberg – something similar could happen with the family, or with those junior designers. The Loop makes everything so much easier – it’s all in one universal location, not laid out through different forums and groups, and event-listings. And – dig this, you can join as many Loops as you want!
Privacy Protection
I’m really pleased with how far ZLoop went to protect user privacy. With all the buzz about Facebook profiles being scoped by potential employers, I figure they’d be darned if they didn’t do something about it – especially for such a social network that could end up so corporate-oriented. And so, ZLoop created their identity manager:
- Essentially, you start off with two identities: Professional and Social.
- Your Professional identity allows you to choose what you want people that you maintain professional relationships with to see – not those embarassing photos, but your more serious side.
- Your Social identity is the exact opposite, and lets people in on your real side.
- That’s not all – you can create more identities to serve different purposes – don’t want your company or your family to see that embarassing picture that you only want your graduating class Loop to see? Create a new Identity, and make the picture the avatar.
I’ve also already mentioned about how ZLoop doesn’t let any third-party view your profile or conversations with others, whether it be a curious friend or a scary stalker. Relationships in this case are a Loop between two people, basically. Simple enough to understand – you can hold conversations, transfer files, and do everything else you can in a Loop with that individual.
The Future
With the growing popularity of widgets, ZLoop has began development of their own widgets, called Portlets. Examples of Portlets would be the Conversation Portlet and Event Portlet that we have already spoken of. However, this is just the tip of the iceberg. With the growing popularity of ZLoop comes the development of more Portlets to suit the needs of its users.
Conclusion
I’ve started a CutEdge Loop which I’d love for you all to join by visiting this URL here. By doing this, you’re not only joining the CutEdge Loop and showing your support, but also gaining access to possibly the newest revolution out there. You can then also create your own Loops, and invite family members and friends and co-workers on board.
Although I’m not sure if this CutEdge Loop idea would work – as we don’t have any real-life relationships to maintain, I have a feeling that we’ll still turn out to be a strong community – something like a set of forums, but also as a way to get new people to meet and share their ideas and opinions through conversations. I hope to be a major participant through ZLoop, if enough people join (my expectations are low, so please sign-up).
Thus wraps up my somewhat comprehensive view into ZLoop. Hopefully, I didn’t bore you half to death – I looked through my previous draft, and ended up cutting half of the material out, but still found this to be a relatively long article. I hope you do give ZLoop a try, even if not through the CutEdge Loop, which is a great way to gain access to ZLoop. Also, pardon the lack of images – there aren’t any Loops I’m part of to show you – yet. And remember – ZLoop is unique, not just another pretty Facebook or Ning.
If you want more information on ZLoop, they’ve got a great Help/FAQ page to help the non-users get started and educated.
Visit:
https://www.zloop.com/portal/Login.html?loopkey=cutedge&keypassword=cutedge
Last.FM, meet Jango
Mar 9th
Last.FM has been around for a long time – ever since I was still relatively new to this whole “social networking” business, I thought that Last.FM was going to revolutionize the world. It’s just that after the five years or so it’s been around, it’s gotten a bit stale. Besides, I’ve usually used Last.FM to discover new music, not new people. I’d much rather have Pandora – which is dedicated to finding new music (somewhat a personalized “internet radio”). When I first heard of Jango, I don’t know why, but it felt exceptionally refreshing. I’d also like to say that Jango is somewhat like Pandora and Last.FM combined together, to give us the best of both worlds. Just what is it that Jango does so darn well?
Jango plays music.
First and foremost, Jango plays music without needing users to register prior to such a service. Just enter the name of your favourite artist, and be prepared to discover music just like it. On occasion a little box might pop up asking you to register, but it’s optional and you can simply close the box and continue listening. I’ve found the music to be great – I’ve heard some great tunes along the way, including Def Leppard (whom I have only heard of before).
Jango learns what you like.
Jango gives three options when rating songs: Don’t Like it, Like it, and Love it – in the form of three emoticons. Clicking the Don’t Like it emoticon will ensure that you never hear the song again. Clicking the Like it button will stir up the number of times you hear the song, and the Love it’s grinning face will etch the fact that you love the song into Jango’s memory. Mostly songs you Love or Like will appear in your Song History, which moves us on to the next point…
Jango plays what you like.
Combining the information from the first two statements will result in this third one, and you are able to play certain songs that are on other users’ radio stations at the current moment. This ability is limited purposely, as it would be violating the Digital Media Copyright Act otherwise (no “music on demand” allowed). I found this feature much more fulfilling than Pandora’s and Last.FM’s abilities. Not to mention you can skip as many songs as you want per hour (take that, Pandora).
Besides those three, I’ve still got a bit to say, but I’ll spare your eyesight and just have a nice little list.
- It looks great.
- It incorporates album art well.
- It integrates social networking arguably as well as Last.FM, if not better.
- It requires no downloading!
- It’s a much more “custom-tailored” experience than Pandora or Last.FM.

The only thing I’m worried for Jango is its ability to continue playing in Canada. Pandora was forced to relinquish its “airwaves” from Canada, and I’m definitely a bit frightened that the same thing will happen to Jango as its popularity continues to increase. However, I’m willing to milk what I’ve got for now and listen to it as much as I can. Remember Jango, if you ever need an advocate, I’m here for you.
Visit: http://jango.com
Monthly $5 Fee to Save the Music Industry?
Feb 20th
As of recent times, the music industry has really been cracking down on P2P users. But, as the saying goes, “When you can’t beat them, join them,” – and I think that this is a much more constructive and productive method to encountering this situation. Rather than start suing little children and other practically harmless individual P2P users, why not make them pay a reasonable sum? On a small-scale, that might not work – but with P2P growing ever so popular, I think it’ll work pretty well on a larger scale (even though we only have 30 million people up here in Canada).
The fee is expected to be charged to consumers’ Internet bills, similar to World of Warcraft, and is expected to rake in $500 million to $900 million, which is to be distributed to the artists. Not a bad concept at all, but will it wreck the entire delicate balance of Canada? First – is the $5/month fee mandatory? I think that we can safely assume it is – because P2P is so widespread in our country that it’d be difficult to verify whether someone was actually downloading music or not (even if they claim to not be downloading so as to avoid the $5/month fee).
This then, would result in a chain of crazy events; music retailers selling CD’s and the such will be seeing their loyal buyers flee away to their own desktops, and will soon meet their downfall. Call me old-fashioned, but I like my music on a CD – it’s just got that much more character, as opposed to some downloaded cyber-shot of album art, its real paper and real plastic.
I like things the way they are – people either do what is right, or what is wrong (morally speaking, legitimately we are all covered by the Canadian umbrella). It’s a choice that everyone will have to make, and brushing it away might be a solution to this problem, but the P2P sharing will eventually grow so popular that movies and games will be pirated even more, leading to more fees? What can we expect then?
I really don’t know if this is as great an idea as it sounds. I’m sure I will miss my CD’s, but if this is the only means that artists can collect their royalties, then I’m afraid I’ll have to pack up my CD case and get on a computer. I believe in people getting what they deserve, whether it be good or bad.
A Rude Letter
Feb 12th
Dear Yahoo! Corp,
The past couple of weeks have been tough, I have to say. Who would’ve thought that things would’ve turned out like this? With you going downhill, I offer to drive a stake down and bring you back up to the top – and what do you do? You go and spurn my advances of $44.6 billion – something that doesn’t happen to me very often. And I don’t like it.
Sure, you could’ve left the meeting with the gigantic Google or the ever-so-handsome Apple, but ya didn’t. I can’t figure you out – you turn all three of us down, and now you claim to be strong enough to return even though you’ve been doing that for as long as I can remember. But I won’t stand for it – if they’re not going to have you, I’m going to take you whether you like it or not.
So now I’m going to have to seize you by my own force and use your shareholders to get to you – and you can’t do jack but watch. Know this – we really could’ve had something special and gotten along, but you had to do things the hard way. I wish you well, and hope you don’t feel too threatened by this – even though you have every right to. I’m not violating you, just liberating you from the clutches of failure.
Your buddy,
Microsoft
P.S. I’m still giving you a chance to accept my proposal, but not for long. Have fun!
Author’s Comment: Thanks to Darren Rowse over at ProBlogger for introducing this concept to me.
Yahoo! Digs Trenches for Long Haul
Feb 8th
Breaking news – well, sorta. Yahoo! corp. is going to fight the Microsoft takeover. I have to admit, such a move really took guts – Yahoo’s risking the support of their stock shareholders in order to stand up to the big guys, and I’m going to say it’s a noble move. But is it smart?
Not exactly, as Yahoo! now lands itself in a pretty precarious position. Without Microsoft, Yahoo! is going to have to find an alternate method of financial support, as it’s been losing funds for a while now – and this task alone won’t be easy (who else will be willing to offer tens of billions of dollars? …Apple…? *wink*). Plus, what I’ve been saying the whole time was that two losers really don’t make a winner – and now, with Yahoo! taking serious consideration (well, more serious than before hopefully) into how they’re going to survive, it looks like they’re going to have to step up their game.
With this short chapter in the saga closed, we can only wait and see what Yahoo! does next. But this definitely is turning very, very interesting. Of course, Microsoft still has a chance, it just has to increase its bidding amount – which would be difficult, but it’s still very feasible. Not to mention the nagging of shareholders should be able to change Yahoo!’s attitude.
Source: http://www.windowsitpro.com/Article/ArticleID/98213/98213.html
Yahoo! Another Possible Purchaser!
Feb 4th
Last week, Microsoft shook the fragile framework of the world by announcing its proposed hostile takeover of Yahoo! corporation for a whopping $44.6 billion dollars. In my opinion, Yahoo!’s continued losses mean that they couldn’t afford to not look at this offer seriously. Alas, as most stories proceed, there emerge a few ironic twists and turns that even I would never have predicted.

Source: http://files.shareholder.com/downloads/YHOO/0x0x10712/25D58133-E6FD-4AD5-A5D0-11AA773135C3/jerry_yang.jpg
Microsoft’s still in it to win it, and could very possibly do so. With Yahoo! chairman Terry Semel resigning, it seems that the opposition to Microsoft’s takeover left with him. However, apparently, Yahoo! CEO Jerry Yang doesn’t seem too fond of Microsoft – but who will Yang turn to in such a time of disaster and Microsoft seemingly coming in to sweep Yahoo! from the outskirts of the web into the mainstream again?
.jpg)
Source: http://images.jeb.be//Apple/apple_logo_(640×480).jpg
Why, Apple, of course! It’s rumoured that Yang has expressed openly admiration for Steve Jobs and the whole Apple crew – and its well-earned, of course. Apple already revolutionized the way we listen to music and now the way we handle mobile devices – perhaps the internet is the next step? However, Apple isn’t the only giant to intervene between the transaction of Microsoft and Yahoo!.
Enter Google – king of the search industry. I was surprised to see such a strong reaction from them, actually – they claimed that Microsoft and Yahoo! combining would lead to a monopoly, which I can sympathize with, but Google has been so successful already that I doubt even such a strong move would be capable of downing Google – now very reluctant to relinquish their view of the top. Understandable.

Source: http://blog.wired.com/photos/uncategorized/2007/06/05/yahoo_logo.jpg
I think the best move would be for Yahoo! to end up in the hands of Apple Corp. as they seem to have a knack for doing things right, and don’t have their own web portal yet – Google’s Google, and Microsoft’s got MSN and Live. I think that Apple + Yahoo! would = an interesting move, but we’ve yet to see the chess game play out.
A Quick Peek at Pandora
Dec 29th
I had a blast during my stay in the states, visiting various places and seeing sights that are hardly available in Toronto. Plus, the Winter was much milder, making the trip that much better. Unfortunately, that meant having hardly anytime to use all those services that piqued my Canadian interests! Luckily, this evening I had a chance to take a quick look at Pandora – which I must admit, is very similar to Last.fm. Thank goodness that’s still available to us.

Pandora loads very quickly, and it guides you through the whole experience very closely. The only difference between Pandora and Last.fm so far as I can see is that Last.fm needs to be downloaded onto the computer to enjoy the total experience, whereas Pandora is fine just on the internet. Basically, all you need to do is input a beloved artist and out comes the results – some new music to explore, as well as probably some of your old favourites.

Pandora’s GUI is great! It’s very user-friendly and it’s a lot more flexible than Last.fm – no need to register, no need to download the client. I’m sure that if I registered, a lot more features would have been available to me; sadly, I don’t think it’d be very realistic to sign up for a service I’m going to lose access to by tomorrow.

Being the picky listener I am, I already found one thing to whine about – the skipping limit! It was a real pain in the behind to know that I wan’t allowed to skip as many songs as I wanted to, due to some “restrictions”. Last.fm actually didn’t have this problem last time I checked. I realized I had used my quota and I gave up Pandora that instant. Might’ve been a hasty decision, but I didn’t have much of a choice anyway – I’m leaving for Canada tomorrow.

It’s probably a bit overrated by Canadians, as Pandora isn’t really that much better to use than Last.fm – in fact, they’re arguably at around the same calibur I daresay. However, I must also emphasize that I haven’t used Pandora to it’s potential yet and this is just a very quick judgment – I can be proven wrong, but it’s just a bummer to realize how restricted it is to an unregistered user. I’m still glad I had this eye-opening experience though – looks like we still can survive without Pandora. And we might have to for a while, because the RIAA hasn’t invaded Canada yet.
Mozilla Weave Concieved – A Look into the Future
Dec 26th
At this day and age, I’m quite surprised that even just a concept of the Weave has been so widely accepted into the world. With viruses and hackers running rampant, I didn’t realize that our metadata was vulnerable enough to have to be stored on a server, as opposed to in our brains. It really does seem like our future is here now – doesn’t it?

Source: http://people.mozilla.com/~cbeard/weave/weave-logo.jpg
The Weave is a new project introduced by Mozilla, which promises to sync all your metadata (saved passwords, cookies, all that good stuff) with a server – preferably your own, yet possibly ones provided by Mozilla – with both being available. How considerate! This means that all your data will be available when you open a Firefox session, and will be automatically synced – wherever you are – including at a restaurant on in your dear grandmother’s house for a nice family gathering.
My main concern with this is how the metadata will be accessed in a secure method. I would assume since metadata consists of such important information, it will be a very sought-after target for hackers. Will the metadata be accessed via a username and password, or will there be a more creative, original method of access? The metadata will all be stored on a server, and you have a choice of either using your own or one provided by Mozilla. I’d like to see how Mozilla handles the situation of teaching an average user how to create their own server, or use part of their computer to store or stream the metadata elsewhere.

Source: http://people.mozilla.com/~cbeard/weave/services-overview-v1.png
The actual server should be very safe from intruders otherwise – if Gmail can keep such large volumes of data safe, I believe that Mozilla, a company so successful with their secure browser Firefox, then I think that they can do the same, if not better, with Weave – where they realize security will be an issue. I also think that this will grow to be a convenient service, but I don’t think it will be a revolutionary one. It’s a step in the right direction though.
Weave provides a promising look into the future, but I’m not sure whether it will be one for better or for worse. Such a tactic makes me wonder if humans are getting lazier – so lazy that they are unable to memorize a few passwords – but alas, that’s a total other social issue. I think it will be great for collaborative purposes as well, as partners will be able to use each other’s data to collect information twice as fast, essentially. What convenience, and what a conception.
Official Information:
http://labs.mozilla.com/2007/12/introducing-weave/
Day-to-day Applications/Use Cases:
Hulu is for Real
Dec 25th
For the past demi-year, Hulu has been officially open as a beta to consumers. But as part of the Canadian public, I’ve lacked the opportunity to try such a service as it was unfortunately unavailable in my region at this time. Either way, I’ve finally arrived south of the border, and I’m dying to try this service out. Luckily, I was able to access the service – if I weren’t, I might’ve died.
Hulu has a wide variety of shows, which all seem to appeal to me. They are all hits on TV, and they are all widely available on the internet – something that Hulu is trying to discourage by officially offering a medium to watch such shows. However, I must object – when you are trying to discourage piracy, please try to include the rest of the world – just something to take into consideration.

A spectrum of features are made available – in fact, something to the most minute detail like changing the background colour is available for the comfort of your eyes. The overall GUI is pretty and goes well with the whole glass look of the new Web, as well as Vista. They also go so far as to offer summaries and user opinions of the shows they offer.

The most important feature of a video site has to be the playback – which I must admit, disappointed me a bit. I must mention that I am using wi-fi, so I might not be getting as strong a signal as I could be, but I still think that streaming a video should be much smoother. I had to wait a while for the video to load, as it was quite choppy at first. Also, it’s resolution isn’t as nice as something like Veoh’s, so I think it wasn’t really worth the hype. Don’t get me wrong, it’s still above Youtube par, but I was certainly expecting more.

Hulu looks very promising at the moment, and if it progresses then it should be a feasible alternative to piracy. However, I’m begging Hulu creators to please make the service more widely available, and to make the videos load faster as well as in higher quality. If you’re still in Canada right now, then you’re really missing out.
Google Enters the Game for KNOLedge’s Sake
Dec 18th
Everyone’s heard of Wikipedia – the infamous encyclopedia that can be edited by pretty much anyone, yet remains accurate and quick enough to look up information on it, as long as cross-references are made. The only thing Wikipedia has yet to improve on is its payments to contributors – something that Google seeks to remedy with Knol. The world can never have too much information – can it?
Basically, Google is launching a new encyclopedia called Knol. User-based, just like Wikipedia with a twist – contributors get paid. Contributors are allowed to write “pages”, and are then given the option of implementing advertisements for the pages – they also get a cut of the profits made. Not a bad idea – people get a cut of how well their articles are written, a great example of capitalism! …right?
My main concern would be plagiarism. Who’s to stop someone from copying articles from Wikipedia and pasting them directly into Knol? On a small-scale that’d be a simple situation to quell, but if used on a large scale it might be a hard situation to stop (I’m sure it’d be in the Terms of Use somewhere). However, Google being the giant it is might have already thought of such a situation and are just biding their time for someone to tempt them into being banned from anything Google for life. Scary thought, isn’t it?
Another nice serving of food for thought – although the details haven’t been released, how would one user be able to contribute such a large article? Wouldn’t there naturally be some bias – and thus require the intervention or assistance of a second user? If so, would the profits be split in half? If everyone does this, won’t the profits become so diluted that it wouldn’t make much of a difference anymore?
Knol looks like a great concept, but there are certainly a few kinks to be worked out. I approve of the idea that there is never enough knowledge, but how Google pulls this together I will be anticipating. Actually, I know they’ve got a way, I just can’t figure out what it is (I live by faith).




