Computers
Look out: Lucid Lynx
Mar 23rd
I’ve been expecting great things from Ubuntu. Here is the down-low: Ubuntu is a distribution of Linux that can be downloaded for free. It is open-source, meaning that it is designed to be greater with every additional user that contributes to coding, application development, etc. Not to mention there are no limits with what you can do — no secret processes running (ahem, “Trusted” Computing and Microsoft). The main thing holding me back from using it with my daily activities would be the hideous GUI (compared to OS X and Windows 7).
Not any longer. Lifehacker‘s recent post on Lucid Lynx contains screenshots that are mindblowing; they feature a new “Zune-themed” GUI, with a combination of purple, black, and orange touches. I really dig it.
Other than that, there a ton of features that should not be overlooked; new applications, new social networking capabilities, etc. I’ve only gotten a minor chance to look at this news, so by all means check it out! And download the VirtualBox image and test it for yourself (it can be found in the Lifehacker link).
For the cause. 
Dell SP2309 23″ Screen: Exceeds HD, for $239 until Midnight!
Dec 4th
Dell Canada has the SP2309 23″ screen — a monitor with 2048×1152 screen resolution (that’s a bit greater than the standard 1080 hd resolution) — for a mere $239 until midnight!
I’m usually not an advocate of spending, but if you have $250 and need an external monitor, this is a must get. It’s a great deal; I’ve personally been a fan of Dell’s monitors ever since I got the S2208W (here’s my review on it: http://cutedge.org/full-hd-in-22-inches-the-dell-s2209w/), and this baby exceeds HD (even if only by a bit)!
Check it out, it’s only on till midnight so get cracking!
HP’s MacBook Pro Clone: Envy
Sep 15th
No doubt there are a huge amount of MacBook Pro fans (I’m one of them) — the new MacBook Pros are cheaper, more efficient, and simpler than ever before. There wasn’t really much competition. Until now.
HP has created an (almost) exactly replica of the MacBook Pro; taking the exterior design of the MacBook Pro and slapping an HP logo on it, but reinventing the inside to have a lot more juice, and a lot more power. Named Envy, this line of laptops was created to capture a portion of those interested in MacBook Pros — the Envy line is more than comparable to Apple’s MacBook Pro.
With an i7 processor and double-digit RAM, and a dedicated ATI graphics card, the Envy is definitely something to keep your eyes peeled for. Available in mid-October, I’d suggest holding off that MacBook Pro until you’ve decided whether Snow Leopard is that essential, and if you can live with Envy and the Windows 7.
Read: http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/15/hp-envy-13-and-15-bring-luxury-to-the-everyman-look-like-macboo/
Read: http://www.hp.com/united-states/campaigns/envy/discover_15.html
5 Free Utilities to Instantly Beautify Windows Vista (and XP)
Aug 29th
Alright, so we’ve got Windows Vista or XP, and we can’t wait for Windows 7 to come out. We absolutely have to make Vista look nice. Like, right now. Here are 5 tools to instantly make Windows Vista or XP that much more bearable. Best of all, they’re free.
1. Ultimate Windows Tweaker
Ever needed to slightly alter the appearance of Windows? Enter Ultimate Windows Tweaker, a utility for Windows Vista and the upcoming Windows 7 to adjust the details of Windows. For example, I remember one time when I decided that shortcut arrows were a nuisance and I didn’t want them to appear on the icons of my desktop. I went into Ultimate Windows Tweaker and performed the adjustments from within – one reboot later, presto! They were gone.
Visit: http://www.thewindowsclub.com/ultimate-windows-tweaker-v2-a-tweak-ui-for-windows-7-vista
2. Avedesk
Avedesk is a favourite amongst many computer customization enthusiasts – it is a program that basically adds a layer onto your desktop that enables gadgets (aka applets, widgets, desklets, etc) to run. I like Avedesk because there are a ton of applets ready to be downloaded, and because it looks beautiful. However, I wouldn’t suggest running it on anything that can’t run Windows XP smoothly – it can significantly slow startup time.
Visit: http://www.avedesk.org/
3. LogonStudio
What’s the first thing anyone sees after the boot screen (excluding those single users who don’t set up a password)? Your login screen! I remembered the first time I saw Vista’s beautiful Aurora-styled login screen – but after a certain number of reboots, it got old. If you’re as bored of the background as I am, be sure to give LogonStudio a look.
Visit: http://www.stardock.com/products/logonstudio/
4. Samurize
Somewhat along the lines of Avedesk (don’t ask me which was the original), Samurize offers a bunch of applets to enhance the look of your Windows desktop. I think Samurize to be a bit more computer-intensive than Avedesk, but it’s still worth a go (hey – it’s free) if you’re wanting to take computer customization to the next level.
Visit: http://www.samurize.com/
5. VistaGlazz (+ DeviantArt)
VistaGlazz is a beautiful two-in-one application – basically, it patches the uxtheme.dll on your computer and replaces the default Aero theme with one that has transparent windows even when maximized. By patching the uxtheme.dll, VistaGlazz opens the world of non-Microsoft themes up to your computer. The transparent Aero theme is reminiscent of the updated theme in Windows 7.
As for third-party themes, there are a ton – stuff designed to emulate OS X, Windows 7, or stuff that’s just way out there. For a grand collection of these themes, visit the Vista Visual Styles collection at DeviantArt (links below).
Visit: http://www.codegazer.com/vistaglazz/
Visit: http://browse.deviantart.com/customization/skins/vistautil/visstyles/
Can you still complain about the ugly look of Windows after running through these five applications? And even if you despise Windows, I’m sure that these applications or patches will make things all the more bearable. More importantly, have fun modifying Windows! Hacking and modifying is an excellent experience to have under your belt.
Moblin: Gotta Love those Tabs
May 20th
There’s a revolution starting about (evidence: 1,2). No need to panic, but you might do a double-take: the netbook revolution has started. You might have noticed some “savvy”-looking people carrying around absolutely minuscule laptops/notebooks. I know I did a double-take. But now, the number of these people are starting to grow exponentially — from a 40-year-old housewife (power to the people!) to that businessman in a power suit. Next thing you know, the majority of people will probably have one of these miniature laptops/notebooks — also known as netbooks. In fact, my own parents have considered getting one as of late — and so have I.
My desire for a netbook comes with the thought of convenient computing. Sure, good old powerful computers are still essential for tasks like heavy photo and video editing, gaming, and rendering — however, lighter, more convenient and portable netbooks are appealing for their quick boot speed and simple UI. Because practically everything in a netbook is accessed through the Internet, it’s not really necessary to have a more “complicated” UI like Windows — instead, the netbook’s main functions can all be covered in just a few tabs or menus.
photo credit: Joe Brockmeier
From the video, Moblin looks like a very inviting and warm operating system — I’ve seen some comments directed to it’s UI being too childish for some of the more mature users, but I personally find it quite refreshing. Also, it’s great that Moblin not only provides easy access to the Internet, but also to more specific and specialized features like direct Twitter updates and media players. Moblin shows great promise, and if I ever manage to get my hands on a netbook, I just might have to give it a whirl. If you’re interested in learning more about Moblin, you can visit them at http://moblin.org/.
The Best of Both Worlds: How to Fool-Proof Your Hackintosh Installation
Apr 11th
It’s obvious that OS X looks infinitely better than Windows (Vista included, even freaking Windows 7 included — I’ve seen those screenshots, and they’re not pretty). But my problem with Macs is that they cost an arm and a leg — for the price I’m paying, I could be receiving a ton more in hardware. Which might not seem like that big a problem — but I, much like many of yourselves, am on a budget. Meaning I can’t afford the Macbook Pro, which would’ve been fine had I been willing to sacrifice performance. I’m not. I want performance. I’m telling you straight up that my Dell Inspiron 6400 can perform just as well as a current Macbook (graphics not taken into account, because the nVidia Go! 7300 is a bit weak). Nonetheless, my point is my machine from two years ago for less than the price of a Macbook today, can perform just as well, or even outperform, one of today’s Macbooks (fancy wordplay).
My Dell Inspiron 6400 has:
- Intel Core 2 Duo T5600 (Merom/1.83 GHz/2MB L2)
- Nanya Technology 2x1GB PC2-4200 @ 4-4-4-12
- NVIDIA GeForce Go 7300 128MB
- Seagate 320GB 5400RPM SATA
- 15.4-inch, 1280×800 pixel display
A current $1,399 Macbook has:
- Intel Core 2 Duo 2.0 GHz
- 2GB 1066MHz DDR3 SDRAM – 2x1GB
- NVIDIA GeForce 9400M graphics
- 160GB Serial ATA Drive @ 5400 rpm
- 13.3-inch, 1280×800 pixel display
I know that most speeds are different, but I hope I got my point across — with similar processors and RAM, a larger hard drive, and a physically larger display, it wouldn’t be worth it for me to spend another $1,399 (before tax) on a Macbook juuuust yet. I’m a full-time student, so I have to keep my spending as tight as possible, for my own good (haha).
Point made — so, I want OS X on my Dell Inspiron 6400. Ordinarily, I would have stopped there, because it used to be technically impossible. Thankfully, Project OSx86 was created and we can now install a copy of OS X onto our ‘ordinary’ PC’s. I’m now going to warn you about some of the moral things wrong with this:
- Users can’t install OS X on non-Apple hardware. Last time I checked, it was in the OS X EULA (I’m 92% sure it still is and always will be — how else would Apple make any money?).
- Users also should have a licensed version of Leopard before they install Leopard on their PC’s. I just feel that this step is necessary to ensure that we are doing it for the right, honourable reason. I’m picking my copy up soon. I’ll post pictures when I do. And if I don’t pick a copy of Leopard up, it’s because…
- Users should be intending to purchase a Mac, and using this version only as something like a ‘trial’ version to get them accustomed to Mac OS X. I intend to purchase a Macbook this summer (well, I kind of have to — the guilt of doing something like this isn’t right — see reason #1).
As long as we admit that we aren’t going to use this as a permanent solution, I think it’s justifiable even to Apple. For the reason that we are going to buy your product soon and need time to adapt to it (for example, finding software for it).
The Installation
Alright, moving on from guilt to the actual process. There are typically 3 stages of installing OS X onto your PC.
- Preparation and Downloading — downloading and burning the actual disc. Also, partitioning would be a good idea.
- Installing — booting up on the disc and then arranging your drive types.
- Troubleshooting…because there will be trouble. Drivers, software, whatever.
1. Preparation and Downloading
Typically, this is the easy stage. Download an image (I found Kalyway 10.5.2 very friendly, but I can’t provide links — find it yourself). Try to download it all in one session, because I found that my success with Kalyway was mainly owed to the constant downloading. I’m paranoid of Torrents missing some data when I pause it accidentally or shut down the computer. So leave your computer on overnight, and/or while you’re at work/school, and don’t touch anything until the .iso image gets fully downloaded.
Burn it using CDBurnerXP. Typically, I’ve read stories about installations being more successful when burned onto a DVD-R, but I used a DVD-RW without a problem (I like their re-usability).
If you plan to use strictly OS X on your PC, then you don’t need to partition.
If you want to dual-boot Windows XP/Vista and Mac OS X, then you’ll want to partition your drives accordingly. Meaning one drive for Windows, and one drive for Mac. I have one for Windows, one for Documents, and one for Mac. The hard drive partition for Mac should be empty right now, so don’t worry about it. If you’re using Windows Vista, instructions for partitioning are here. XP users I can’t say for sure, but I found a post on how to partition here. Comments in the post are interesting too, read them.
2. Installing
If everything went alright, then you should have a burnt disc. Take it out, inspect it, and then put it back in your drive. Reboot your computer. At the blue/black manufacturer screen (mine says Dell, yours might say HP or Sony or something), press the according button to boot via CD/DVD drive (I think for Dell users it’s F2 or F12). You should see a bunch of text on a black screen, then after a few moments, the OS X installer should pop up. Proceed through the installer, pause on the last step before installing. You’re going to want to customize it according to your computer, because OS X typically isn’t compatible with all sorts of hardware by default. This will be a problem later on.
The installation typically takes an hour including the disc check (I did it for my first couple of times), half an hour without. After rebooting, your computer should play the welcome video (if you have graphical stuttering, it’s because you have a dual core machine and OS X is being cooky. Reboot, type in ‘-v’ and press enter. Then type in ‘cpus=1′ and press enter. Everything should be fine. Type in the information (I didn’t use my real information because I’m really, really paranoid).
3. Troubleshooting
Drivers don’t work. It’s a normal thing. What’s not normal is if everything works fine with your OS X installation on your PC (which can now be dubbed a ‘hackintosh’). Proceed to InsanelyMac and search everything you can find about your specs. Even better — register and write about your problems, or thank them for their work.
Dell Inspiron 6400 users are in luck — user Devilhood has written up a comprehensive guide on how to get everything working on your Dell Inspiron 6400: from sound, to displays. Here’s the link to his guide.
The Secret
The secret is in two parts — the philosophy, and the methodology of installation. Your philosophy at all times should be that you have lived until now without OS X, and you can continue living without OS X. With this mentality, you will be able to sacrifice your stable installation to install some weird drivers to make everything work — which is your goal, to have a functional Hackintosh. Your methodology should be simple and easy — stick to Google and InsanelyMac for your problems. I can be of minor service if you are a Dell Inspiron 6400, but I will not go out of my way to help you find out whether your video card is compatible or something complex like that (sorry, but I’ve got my own things to work on too).
And always remember you can go back to Windows at any time. I know you don’t want to, and you know you don’t want to — but I’ve had to repeatedly agree to the concept of buying a Mac and actually overspending. Because of this though, I feel that I can actually move on and purchase a real Mac eventually. Haha.
I wish you luck. Feel free to comment or pose questions. If you need something silly, like the knowledge of how to get dual monitors to work on your Dell Inspiron 6400 or how to get sound to work, I think I can be of minor assistance.
And in the end, it took me a year and three months to figure out how to do this properly. So be persistent. Prior to 2009, I didn’t even get past the second stage of installation — so yeah, I didn’t get to see an actual working desktop until early March (during the break, when I swore to myself I’d get it working). If you want to see a result of my frustration (and a barrage of insults on my intelligence, haha), feel free to read this post where I wrote about my installing of OS X in third-person and referred to myself as ‘a friend’ because of my paranoia.
Buying Smart: Picking out a New Computer
Jan 27th
I’ve always been an advocate for buying computers, in comparison to building them. It’s not because I don’t have the balls — it’s just that nowadays, manufacturers offer so many various options that I see no more advantage in building my own computer:
- Customizability: Dell offers customizations for free. You can decide where you want to spend the most of your money — for example, if you’re going to watch movies or play games, you can choose to get a more powerful graphics card.
- No Risk: You can short-circuit one of your peripherals just like that *snap* when you’re building your own computer. Why take the risk (if you want it for the experience, then be my guest)?
- Support: Usually computers come with at least a year’s limited warranty. After that, you can still choose to pay for support and whatnot — if you build a computer, good luck when something breaks down.
- Part Selection: There are so many types of computer parts it makes me dizzy just thinking about it (ATA vs. SATA hard drives, DDR2 vs. DDR3 RAM, etc.) and you have to make sure your motherboard is compatible with everything. Right. Good luck with that. Manufacturers assemble the computers, so you can bet your bottom dollar that they work (if they didn’t, then Future Shop and Best Buy wouldn’t buy from them, right?).
- Small Price Margins: Nowadays, at most, I’m thinking you’ll save $100. Tops. Assuming nothing breaks down when you build it, you pick all the right pieces at the lowest prices ever. But manufacturers make prices so appealing now (especially Dell with their coupons). Reel me in, Dell (I’m a big fan of Dell, been running on a Dell Inspiron 6400 for a good year and a half now).
As far as I’m concerned, I’d rather be able to just walk into a store or go online and pick up a computer, and not worry about it. I figure there’s a lot more things in life to worry about, like the recession, apocalypse, your relatives overseas, etc (I’m not poking fun, I’m actaully dead serious — besides the apocalypse).
photo credit: Llandudnoandy
But would walking into a store and totally trusting the customer rep be wise? Hm, probably not. Firstly:
- Nobody’s perfect, so the customer rep may make a few mistakes on occasion.
- They might have other interests — including commission, in the back of their minds (I know that Best Buy claims not to work on commission anymore, I think that’s great).
- There may be a misunderstanding in communication, leading them to make you pay for more than you need or less than you need.
You don’t necessarily need to do as much research as you would when building a computer (trust me, the difference in research between buying a computer and building one is like comparing a splinter to a log, respectively). I suggest starting off from my post on How to Buy a Computer in 2008 (I wrote it in LATE 2008, so it’s still applicable — I’ll probably follow-up soon though, so keep your eyes peeled). Give it twenty minutes, or half an hour. Google around the web, and I’m sure you’ll find what you need.
If anything, you should always arm yourself with information. If you don’t want to do it yourself, find a loved one that knows a lot about technology and has your best interests in mind (advice: kids these days know a lot about technology). Bring them along, or have them spend ten minutes with you configuring your computer on the Internet. When in doubt, feel free to comment or e-mail me, and I’ll try my best to help you out.
Hope you have fun picking out a new computer!
Full HD in 22-inches: The Dell S2209W
Jan 6th
I’ve read a bunch of articles on dual-monitors and their benefit towards productivity. I even tried a pair of dual monitors on my own, which wasn’t a bad experience — but I had to return the monitor to its original owners, so it was a pain moving it back and forth after use. I really wanted an external monitor — I was expecting to use it primarily as just a replacement, and not so much an addition to my laptop screen (except at times when I needed to do real work).
So I went with the Dell S2209W. Mainly because I trusted Dell (and my cousin Jonathan from APH Networks really boosts them), but also because I found it for $189.99 during Dell’s 12 Days of Deals a month ago (happy new year, by the way).
I wasn’t expecting much though. I just wanted an ordinary LCD — in fact, if I could find one for an appropriate price, I would’ve gladly picked up a 17″ monitor — saves my Ikea desk some space. But enough stalling: how exactly do I find the Dell S2209W, and was the dive worth it?
I tried taking a more “structured” approach to this review: please, tell me what you think! Inspired by Anandtech’s review on the BenQ E2200HD (a monitor very similar to the S2209W).
Design/Build Quality
Refreshing lack of gloss: the “matte” display. In contrast to the glossy frame of the Dell S2209W (a cool addition, matches my Das Keyboard very well), the display doesn’t have a layer of gloss over it like my Dell Inspiron 6400 does. So far, I appreciate it: it’s affected less by the Incandescent bulb in my study, and now I can actually open the blinds when I compute — that’s right, it fights the glare!
The glossy frame itself can be a topic of debate: although it’s great from a design standpoint, it attracts dust and shows it off. Much like the Das Keyboard. I’ll admit that during normal computing, I can’t notice it — but when I take those macro pictures, I’m a bit ashamed at how dusty it’s getting. As for maintenance to counter the dust, I guess a quick Swiffer every so-often couldn’t hurt.
Kinda cool base: The base that the display stands on is sizeable enough to offer good balance. And it’s got a little embedded lower level — perfect for holding loose change (I’ll keep it clean though, I assure you). Hm, I wonder if it’d have been possible to add a second level and put some USB ports in there though.
No clips to tame those cables and wires! I did manage to stick the majority of cables out through the square tunnel that the Dell S2209W has on the stand, but clips right behind the bottom of the display itself to keep the cables from sight: out of sight, out of mind. Personally, I find it just a bit annoying — but I know quite a few enthusiasts who are big on cabling.
No built-in swivel! Yipes. Although the vertical resolution is acceptable (1080px, great in comparison to 800px on my Dell Inspiron 6400), I really would’ve loved a swivel for reading those long passages (something like this review).
The button placement is typical for today’s monitors: all located on the side, hidden from the eyes and easy to reach. Much appreciated are those little icons — but I just prefer experimenting. The power button is pretty cool though — I didn’t know how to turn the display off at first, but it turns out you actually push the Power light, which will slide down into the frame of the Dell S2209W. It’s really, really cool. It changes to white when the display is active, orange when inactive, and it turns off when the display shuts down. It’s amazing how simple a feature it is, yet how much a contribution it makes to the beauty of the display.
No built-in speakers: meh, didn’t really matter much to me. If you can afford this monitor at regular pricing, you can probably afford a pair of speakers. Har har. Plus, I tend not to believe in the sound quality of monitors (iMac included).
No USB ports: because I’m using a laptop, I always appreciate extra USB ports. The Dell Inspiron 6400 features 4 ports — not exactly a generous amount, but sufficient for now. The Das Keyboard features two ports, and it’s getting enough power not only to power itself but also my Logitech G5 and my iPod on occasion. If the monitor gets power from USB and from the outlet, why not include a few ports? Again, oh well — not a matter of life and death.
No HDMI?! I’m going to be perfectly honest — hold your “boo”s, please — I’m not 100% sure what HDMI is. Here’s what I do know though: it’d probably be best to have HDMI when you want to play PS3 or Blu-Ray on a display. And if I’m going to pay $269.99 for this thing, I want it to be able to display my PS3 and Blu-Ray movies to its best. Doesn’t matter to me, since I have neither a Blu-Ray player nor a PS3, but if I had one I’d be raging.
Official Technical Specifications
| Dell S2209W | |||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
| Environmental and Regulatory | |||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Wow, I’m surprised at how well that chart turned out: you can find the original chart here.
A few observations: it wasn’t just careless observation, it’s official — there’s no HDMI input. I never knew there was a security port though — this would be great for places such as classrooms or even University dormitories (in case you don’t trust your roommates — shame on you, haha only joking).
And a TN panel. Many criticize it for being sucky, I really don’t mind. Of course, I haven’t used anything but TN-panels, but I don’t see what’s so bad about it — image quality is fine during regular computing (and editing). However, for those wanting the best movie-viewing/video-gaming experience, this might be the dealbreaker. First no HDMI, and now this? Keep hope alive.
Unique Screen Resolution and Aspect Ratio
Typically, widescreen computer monitors have an aspect ratio of 16:10 — and thus, 22-inch monitors typically have a screen resolution of 1680×1050 pixels. I never really liked that. I tend to prefer “sharper” images — the most pixels on the least screen area as possible. Meaning that 1680×1050 pixels would’ve been fine, if it was mounted on a 20-inch screen. And if I were to buy anything bigger than a 20-inch monitor, I’d have to go for a 24-inch monitor (they’re not that expensive nowadays) for the 1920×1200 pixels. So when I found the Dell S2209W on Dell’s 12 Days of Deals, I placed an order on it ASAP.
And I didn’t regret it. The pixels are no joke — everything looks much crisper, sharper, and I don’t need to worry about horizontal scrolling anymore. It’s downright impressive at how Dell managed to fit such a high resolution into a 22-inch monitor. 1080 pixels also classifies it as “HD”, but seeing as how I’m connected via VGA, I can’t accurately comment on it. But after eagerly downloading “Amazing Caves in 1080″ from Microsoft’s WMV HD Content Showcase, I had a look. 1080p video was of near-excellent quality; however, I did feel that bright colours were displayed much more precisely than darker ones, which were slightly grainy (almost artifacting).
I also started catching up on some of my favourite anime: downloading 5 episodes from Dattebayo, I watched Bleach in 480p. Wasn’t bad, but it was definitely very different from the 1080p video. Who would’ve thought, right?
What about Image/Video Quality?
Although initially, I had to run it on 1680×1050 pixels because my “graphics card didn’t support it”, according to Dell. But, after clicking through some options and updating my drivers, I actually got it to work — imagine my excitement! From a warped, butt-ugly image (because of the 16:10 resolution on the 16:9 screen ratio), to a crisp, sharp image with a ton of screen real estate.
The Dell S2209W by default was a bit blurry, but after some minor manual tweaking, everything was to my preference (I’m not that picky). As I said earlier, even 1080p plays on full-screen — no black lines, nothing. It’s freaking beautiful. 480p and 720p videos also play full-screen thanks to the Dell S2209W’s aspect ratio, and the differences are viewable (480p is a bit blurrier — not as crisp as 1080p). However, as I did mention earlier, I found the bright colours in videos to be displayed a bit more accurately than darker colours, which were a bit grainy for my taste. But, it could most certainly be due to that VGA connection (still not 100% sure).
I found images to be displayed clearly, sharply, and beautifully. Everyday-use with website graphics is child’s play for the Dell S2209W (as it should be), but the extra pixel count does take a bit of getting used to. Imagine this: from 1280×800 pixels to 1920×1080 pixels. No complaints here though, it’s an excellent adjustment.
Troubleshooting
If you can’t get your Dell S2209W to display at 1920×1080 pixels, update your drivers. After calling Dell Support (the reps did play a part in solving the problem, as they isolated my video card’s maximum resolution being the issue), and Googling around, it’s not an uncommon problem. And updating your drivers is now a near automated process, all thanks to Microsoft. In Windows Vista:
- Right-click your desktop.
- Select “Personalize”.
- Select “Display Settings”.
- Select “Advanced Settings” at the bottom right corner of the window.
- Select the “Adapter” tab, then under “Adapter Type” select “Properties”.
- Select the “Driver” tab in the window that opens, and then click the “Update Driver” button.
- Relax, let Microsoft search for the latest drivers. If there is a newer driver version, it will automatically be downloaded and installed. Hello, improved hardware improvement. Otherwise, sorry — your video card could either be too old or lacking in performance to support such a high resolution. Get a new one, or give away your Dell S2209W (hey, I had to accept this fact too).
Worked for my nVidia Go 7300, which isn’t bad but isn’t exactly “card of the year”. It wouldn’t be a bad idea to Google your graphics card to see its maximum resolution though, in retrospect. Also, updating your drivers will (likely) improve performance — do it whether you’re getting a new monitor or not!
What are ya waitin’ for…
For $269.99, it can go both ways: if you’re looking for a new monitor and do a lot of video-editing (and are not planning to use Blu-Ray or a PS3), then it’s perfect. Heck, I recommend it not only to amateur designers, but to writers and gamers as well (the 16:9 feature on CS:S works well — trust me). It’s the most screen real estate you’ll ever get in a 22-inch monitor — so if you browse the Internet a lot, want to view more than one page on Microsoft Word at once (I can seriously do two at once now, at 100%), take high-res photos, or download some HD content and take advantage of Youtube’s new standard 720p, get it. If you find it for less than $269.99, get it.
If you want a monitor for gaming or watching Blu-Ray movies though, you might want to have a look at BenQ’s E2200HD, as reviewed by AnandTech. Yeah, I tried my best emulating it, but it’s really not the same (especially without “Input” Lag tests, colour accuracy tests, and a comparison to other “real” monitors).
3G Plans for the extra $30: Get ‘em while you still can!
Sep 14th
More than just a few friends of mine have the iPhone 3G. While I’m a huge fan of the iPod Touch and its Wi-fi capabilities, I have to say that the iPhone offers much more flexibility in data: especially when equipped with the $30 for 6GB of data transfer. Actually, 6GB is more like “unlimited”: according to CNet, only one percent of users use more than a gigabyte of data transfer.
Unfortunately, looks like the plan is ending soon: according to Boy Genius Report, new plans will be introduced to Rogers on October 1st — meaning you folks have only got a couple of weeks to finalize those 3G plans!
I’ve included a screenshot for you to see if your phone is compatible with the plan — sadly, the HTC Touch is not. And the Samsung Jack is. Oh well, looks like I have some regretting to do (just kidding, no Wi-fi on the Samsung Jack). If you can get it, then what are you waiting for? The convenience is beautiful — whether you want it for research-on-the-go or browsing Youtube, you absolutely need to grab the plan. Quick!
Get me a real Mac: My Hackintosh Experience
Aug 22nd
There are many of us out there that have caught glimpses of putting OS X on a regular computer, such as a Dell or an HP. Personally, I’ve already been curious enough to try it more than once – however, I’ve consistently failed in the most embarrassing manner – I could never manage to burn the disc right.
During my sabbatical, I rekindled my love affair with Apple, but I still felt as though Macbooks were pretty damn expensive – especially when it still possessed similar hardware to my year-old Dell Inspiron 6400. If I had a perfectly comparable computer right now, why consider a new one with similar specs?
That all changed one night, when I actually had a dream I was using iTunes in OS X, browsing through my albums with Coverflow (I’ve got weird dreams). There it was: Sweet Emotion by Aerosmith, It’s My Life by Bon Jovi – you know the rest. The dream was peculiarly vivid – and it really made me think: how can I get Apple’s OS X without going through a Mac?
Let me tell you something first: I’m not an advocate of installing OS X on non-Apple hardware. Personally, I think that it’s acceptable as long as it’s honestly just used to try the Mac experience – after all, the price jump really is a huge dissuading factor. With that in mind, I tried it just to see if I could really be as happy with a Macbook as I am with my Dell Inspiron 6400.
A friend of mine, who actually has a very similar computer to my own (we’re pretty close, so we actually bought computers together), took a jump and offered to trade laptops with me. He had previously turned it into a Hackintosh already, but I was able to ask him how the installation went: “a living hell,” he described it. “Installing graphics drivers made my mouse jump – something that I’d never seen with Windows, and so after three or four tries, I just decided to go with the native 1024 x 768px. Oh, I forgot to mention: he had a 14.1″ widescreen monitor. I really felt for him, because nothing really looked the same.
The Actual Experience
Let me re-iterate: I am not an advocate of installing OS X on non-Apple hardware. I wanted to really see how the OS X was, and if I thought it was worth it. Problem is, with the Hackintosh, the things that really matter just wouldn’t work:
- Sound: apparently, the included drivers didn’t freaking work. This knocks out my dream of playing Aerosmith and Bon Jovi on the glory of the Mac, but also negates the possibility of working with Garageband. My two greatest aspirations, destroyed.
- Video: just didn’t look that great, due to the lack of graphics drivers. Imagine 5:4 image on a 16:10 screen. It was brutal.
- Unresponsive: maybe it was the lack of compatibility, but OS X was actually slower and less snappy than Windows Vista when running on the same machine. Disappointing.
- Boot: needed the DVD – and sometimes would go into endless boot loops. Dear God.
So for all the hard work put into emulating Mac OS X on Windows – which my friend told me took him endless hours to figure out how to burn and then work out the technical issues – I find the results a bit disappointing. Some will think differently, and some will have much different results and thus be much more satisfied. Personally, I just want to leave you with this: don’t expect a real Mac experience.
What Now?
So your dreams, like my own, have been crushed. I apologize. Alas, hope is not lost – I have decided to refocus my efforts to produce the Mac experience by actually, officially, legally purchasing an Apple Mac Mini. Or a Macbook, depending on my resource fund. Either way, the idea here is to purchase a real Mac – sure, a Hackintosh can help emulate the experience, and it wasn’t totally non-worthwhile. But, it will only take you so far.
And in the end, with a real Mac, we get to decide whether the juice is worth the squeeze.
If you’re still considering turning your ordinary Dell into a Hackintosh, and my article still didn’t deter you, then I’ve got one quote for you: “Get busy living, or get busy dying.” Will you live your plan, or let it die? And no, for legal reasons, I will still not advocate installing OS X on non-Apple hardware.
April 11, 2009 Update: I’ve decided to write a post following up this one about how I got OS X to work on my PC and hoping to be of more inspiration to fellow experimentors. Good luck.
http://cutedge.org/the-best-of-both-worlds-how-to-fool-proof-your-hackintosh-installation/